Document.Bot

Chatting with a folder is easy to promise. The harder and more useful part is showing where an answer came from. Document.Bot keeps citations close enough to open in the original file before the draft becomes a report, proposal, or client deliverable. The privacy story changes with the model route. Users can choose hosted APIs, EU providers, or local servers such as LM Studio and Ollama, and that choice determines where model processing happens.

Document.Bot indexes files in a local project folder and searches PDFs, Word documents, tracked changes, Excel workbooks, notes, and technical references.

Users can tag folders or selected evidence into a chat, search by keyword or description, open citations in the source file, review suggested Word edits, and reuse workflow-specific skills. Model routes include hosted APIs, EU providers, LM Studio, and Ollama.

It is for people whose drafts need a source trail, especially research, proposal, compliance, audit, and client-work teams.

Anyone working with sensitive documents should choose the model route deliberately and inspect the cited evidence. A local project folder does not make every model option local.

The clickable source trail is the feature that makes Document.Bot more than another chat box for files. It gives a reviewer somewhere concrete to check the answer.

Users still own the final verification and the privacy choice. Both depend on the documents and model route they select.